Yeah, that worked in the olden days, but booking enough bands with less than 10000 and hasn't been on the boat before to warrant actually discussing and voting seems very unlikely so I expanded to follow the rules that at least could be followed.
I think it's a little early to discuss changing the Cripper rules. The announcements before tickets are on sale are there to get people to buy (bigger names). I expect we will get some real Cripper bands after sales start. Besides, there is no real voting until after the cruise anyway. Can't vote a performance you have not seen :)MuzakMaker wrote: ↑Wed Nov 16, 2022 4:46 pmYeah, that worked in the olden days, but booking enough bands with less than 10000 and hasn't been on the boat before to warrant actually discussing and voting seems very unlikely so I expanded to follow the rules that at least could be followed.
Oh, I'm not saying change them now. But it's kind of pointless to even bring this up at all at this point if we think there's no valid bandsslayergeek wrote: ↑Wed Nov 16, 2022 5:18 pmI think it's a little early to discuss changing the Cripper rules. The announcements before tickets are on sale are there to get people to buy (bigger names). I expect we will get some real Cripper bands after sales start. Besides, there is no real voting until after the cruise anyway. Can't vote a performance you have not seen :)MuzakMaker wrote: ↑Wed Nov 16, 2022 4:46 pmYeah, that worked in the olden days, but booking enough bands with less than 10000 and hasn't been on the boat before to warrant actually discussing and voting seems very unlikely so I expanded to follow the rules that at least could be followed.
I'm not sure if omitting number of albums is good for nominees. Some of those bands you are counting clearly have more than one album
I was suggesting moving to "Spotify criteria" because nowadays MANY of us use it and I really believe it's the most reliable criteria when it comes to evaluating how popular a band is. Much more than last.fm. And yes, as I said 6 bands is a good number, I agree.
All good you make a valid point! I use both last.fm and spotify so don't care either way :)bodomdragon wrote: ↑Mon Jan 16, 2023 4:05 pmI was suggesting moving to "Spotify criteria" because nowadays MANY of us use it and I really believe it's the most reliable criteria when it comes to evaluating how popular a band is. Much more than last.fm. And yes, as I said 6 bands is a good number, I agree.
Hey, I'm one of the organizers, or at least I was, so my game, my rules.
(Kidding, whatever the fuck you guys want, I really couldn't care less )
Yep. Might need to adjust a little since last.fm has lost a lot of popularity (at least in the US).but that's not a deal breaker for me.
I'm pretty sure Nightmare won one year and they'd been around for a couple of decades
My suggestion would be making a slight adjustment (changing point 2), following a criteria more focused on the "lesser known bands" rather than establishing a certain threshold:
This methodology is statsman-approved.bodomdragon wrote: ↑Tue Jan 17, 2023 2:49 amMy suggestion would be making a slight adjustment (changing point 2), following a criteria more focused on the "lesser known bands" rather than establishing a certain threshold:
1. The 6 bands with the lesser listeners on Spotify are selected
2. The band must have never played on the boat before
3. The band must not have "famous" members (from other well-known bands, for instance)
4. If any of the 6 selected bands in point 1 break rules 2 or 3, the next less listened band makes it to the list, ensuring we have 6 candidates (10% of the lineup)
OK, I understand better now. I second this motionbodomdragon wrote: ↑Tue Jan 17, 2023 2:49 amMy suggestion would be making a slight adjustment (changing point 2), following a criteria more focused on the "lesser known bands" rather than establishing a certain threshold:
1. The 6 bands with the lesser listeners on Spotify are selected
2. The band must have never played on the boat before
3. The band must not have "famous" members (from other well-known bands, for instance)
4. If any of the 6 selected bands in point 1 break rules 2 or 3, the next less listened band makes it to the list, ensuring we have 6 candidates (10% of the lineup)
I'm adding the spotify listeners now. I wondered the same thing but my perception is that Dear Mother will not make it anyway (has a relatively high amount of monthly listeners).
I would suggest you just type the name and then we can decide together. For now the "famous members" have had no impact on the current candidates.
Yeah, that looks like a good list. We'll have to see if the last 10(+) change it.bodomdragon wrote: ↑Tue Jan 17, 2023 10:41 am OK so I completed the first version of the Excel file (thanks toby and anyone else who may have helped!). You can all check the file itself (please don't break it) but this is what it looks like right now:
Empress 789
Fractal Universe 3302
Cryptosis 3363
Isole 3388
Osyron 3627
Eshtadur 9301
Hei'an 10148
Deathless Legacy 10200
Hideous Divinity 12473
Nothgard 13961
These are the less listened bands plus the monthly listeners in Spotify. In bold the six candidates by the rules we defined before. Sad to see Hei'an doesn't make it.
I'd be cool with a followers metric. I think listens on last.fm was probably outdated because I know that I hadn't even logged in there in years. And Spotify (at least in the US) is a popular platform.Danny24601 wrote: ↑Tue Jan 17, 2023 5:39 pm Looks like I'm a bit late to the conversation but I'd vote against using spotify listeners as opposed to spotify, instagram, or Facebook followers, or some other more durable metric.
Monthly listeners are really variable as they only track how many people have listened to you in the past month, this number often can swing quite big even for small bands after a release or announcement and it can dip low even for established acts if they've been inactive for a period. This is causing us to overrate acts with recent releases and underrate acts in between active periods (see Isole vs. Hei'an).
I'd also vote against a limit of 6 in favor of a hard cutoff at a round number, I suspect skipper will book varying numbers of crips in different years.
Just opinions, happy to leave the rules as is if we feel like we're rolling already.
That WOULD be an interesting stat. That being said, I need to update my list in the app. I'm sure I put a couple bands as Must when announced that have become Might since then.slayergeek wrote: ↑Tue Jan 17, 2023 5:56 pm While I would doubt you guys would want to use this “officially”, and interesting metric might be which cripper band got the highest “boost” during the cruise.
I am going to publish must/might/won’t the day of the cruise. For example right now Helen is at 24.24% must see. If after the cruise that number is 40% people must have really dug them on the boat.
It probably shouldn’t count officially, but it would be an interesting stat to see the most improved post cruise.
The problem with using followers is it's a one time interaction. Click follow and then if you forget to unclick follow you still still get tracked whereas any method of tracking active engagement does all the work of filtering out those types of listeners for usDanny24601 wrote: ↑Tue Jan 17, 2023 5:39 pm Looks like I'm a bit late to the conversation but I'd vote against using spotify listeners as opposed to spotify, instagram, or Facebook followers, or some other more durable metric.
Monthly listeners are really variable as they only track how many people have listened to you in the past month, this number often can swing quite big even for small bands after a release or announcement and it can dip low even for established acts if they've been inactive for a period. This is causing us to overrate acts with recent releases and underrate acts in between active periods (see Isole vs. Hei'an).
I'd also vote against a limit of 6 in favor of a hard cutoff at a round number, I suspect skipper will book varying numbers of crips in different years.
Just opinions, happy to leave the rules as is if we feel like we're rolling already.
Users browsing this forum: Semrush [Bot] and 119 guests
70000TONS, 70000TONS OF METAL and the 70000TONS OF METAL logo are registered trademarks of Properties of Metal Ltd. and are used under license.
© 2009-2023 UMCruises International Ltd. All Rights Reserved.